Fort Grunt

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Further thinkin

Okay, so yesterday we talked about more specifics about projects to start, and also ways of taking advantage of the BCAC space, which we should find out about this week. I'll keep looking this week, but this seems like the right space for some of the ideas we're getting...

So with the first project, we could start with a 1920's character (name?) whose journals, drawings, and photos have been found (from one outing), and are being presented seriously, with as little hat-tripping at possible. One immediate venue for this is the Duke biology department, there can be other options as this progresses.

The work itself can include drawings, watercolors, prints, photo-based work (cyanotypes, black and white, etc), done in documentation style, along with a healthy amount of text, which can also help to bring in a narrative and some humor. I think working this way we can still work with the more general idea about looking at how people come up with ways of validating their way of looking at the world. A number of the drawing/photos can be arranged in various grids, etc as the work takes on it's own internal logic.

An option, versus the natural history museum option, would be to present this to local science musuems and university science departments, completely straight. Maybe one of us is related in some way. Either way, this could definitely be done after say a show at Duke, after broshures are made, could keep it going/changing it while going ahead with further projects. Proposals to science museums could help to hone the serious tone of the work, too.

I think these sorts of drawings can lead easily into ideas for the windows of the BCAC spaces, the motorized rolls that could also be shown in gallery spaces, etc, working with sequential ideas, involving the science/biology ideas, etc. The dual window thing also affords other sequencing ideas. Also, there's that the street we'd be on will be getting a good amount of foot traffic, so work should have both broad elements (to be seen by passing cars) and details (to hold in passerby).

Yeah, I think that was it.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Upcoming opportunities...

Just to throw out a few ideas:

1. The Cincinnati Fringe Festival- could be a good opportunity for trying something involving the printing of something to be handed out. Could just be that, something we can make and send there, or it could, if appropriate, have other elements that would have to be installed. The deadline for the proposal is Apr 26th, the show isn't until May 31st.

2. Sam and Karen in Minneapolis were talking about organizing a drawing show sometime in the late fall, maybe November or December. We should have work by then, as the date approaches we could have a better idea of what to do, space we would have, etc.

3. Keep in mind the possibility of organizing a show, around the idea of art and science. It could be interesting to involve both artists and scientists, but I saw something like that at the Fabric Workshop, and the scientific work (mostly photos and video) were pretty dry and boring, especially considering some of the work (Julie Mehretu, Mathew Ritchie, Trenton Doyle Hancock) was really good.

4. There are a couple of juried print shows that could be worth putting work in for:
The Minnesota Print Biennial (due in early May)
The International Print Center of New York's seasonal juried shows, the next one of those is due up may 4th- the next will be 3 months from then...)

5. Local places to apply to once we start getting work done:
Branch Gallery (Durham)
Lump Gallery (Raleigh)
Artspace (Raleigh)
Contemporary Art Center (Atlanta)
SECCA (Winston-Salem)
Hub-Bub (Spartenburg, SC)

6. The Emerging Artist grant with the Durham Arts Council, due in September. We'll have to meet with someone there to figure out how to utilize the residency/resume thing.

7. Hosting the website through yourarthere.net, they are some people I know from Bloomington, reasonable rates ($3 a month for 100mb), if you know a better one let me know.

8. Also, looking up more things with the NC Arts Council. Visual Artists cannot apply for individual artist grants in 2006, so we'll be looking to Nov. 2007 to apply for that one. There are also grants for residencies at Headlands or Vermont Studio Center, either of which would be worth doing.

We can organize this stuff better when we get the studio taken care of, but worth thinking about now (esp. as some deadlines will be close...) Add more as you find any.

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Article from New York Times

Artists in Midcareer and Beyond Are Showing That Experience Matters

By HOLLAND COTTER
Published: April 21, 2006

DON'T trust anyone over 30" was the street wisdom I grew up with.

I still find that excellent advice. But my faith in youthful inspiration has been tested recently; by art, of all things, or rather by the art world's fixation on barely-out-of-school talent.

Not that my interest in new art has in any way diminished. It hasn't. Still, these days I find my attention drawn to the not-so-new, to artists who are in midcareer and beyond, sometimes far beyond. Many such artists are in evidence in galleries and museums this month, and I'll mention a handful below, among them a posthumous hero, a poet-turned-artist, an octogenarian debutante. They have one thing in common: their work has developed over time and maintained its presence for a number of years. In a fast-food culture, as capricious in its erasures as in its rewards, that's the vote of confidence that counts.

Midcareer is a flexible category, defined partly by age, partly by time on the job. Sherrie Levine, a New York-based Conceptual artist who has a fine show at Paula Cooper Gallery, qualifies on both counts. Now just shy of 60, she had her first gallery solo in 1974, and came into her own in the 1980's with the wave of East Village "appropriation art," work that lifted images from art history and popular culture to comment on history and culture themselves.

Ms. Levine's initial borrowings were from male modernists. She re-photographed Walker Evans photographs and presented the copies as her own to question what labels like "original" and "classic" meant, and why they were always applied to art by men. Her references have since expanded to literature and social history. Her shows have become free-associational ensembles, complex, witty, difficult to parse.

The Cooper show, which combines photographs of Spanish colonial religious paintings and Edward S. Curtis shots of Native Americans, with bronze casts of phrenological heads, human jawbones and hunting dog figurines, is no exception. It is at once an extended still life, a personalized collection and an essay on art, myth, politics and devotion. In it, Ms. Levine is doing basically what she was doing 20 years ago. But without changing her signature non-signature style, she has advanced and deepened her range. From questioning the original, she has become an original.

Gary Simmons is on a similar track. At 42, he has already had a midcareer survey, which recently came to the Studio Museum in Harlem. And his art is in the process of subtle, logical change. He is best known for his wall drawings of racially charged cartoon images, done in smudged white chalk on a dark ground. Rude but super-elegant, they're like graffiti art by Tiepolo.

The three new, king-size drawings that make up his solo show at Bohen Foundation, titled "1964," apply the same style to what appears at first to be neutral content. The images depicted — Philip Johnson's ultra-Modernist Glass House, the New York State Pavilion at the 1964 World's Fair in Flushing, Queens; and the repeated form of a swinging chandelier from the Alfred Hitchcock film "Marnie" — are, in Mr. Simmons's view, symbolically related.

Johnson, who had a history of fascist enthusiasms, designed the New York State Pavilion, at the invitation of the fair's president, Robert Moses. Moses was the man responsible for a slash-and-burn redesign of New York that all but destroyed certain working-class neighborhoods. The swinging chandelier, from a film about deceit and psychic instability, is intended as emblematic of a year that saw both the first stirrings of protest against the war in Vietnam and the murder of civil rights workers in Mississippi. It was also the year Mr. Simmons was born. All that information is burning away on a slow fuse in his art.

Although drawing is the medium of the moment, Mr. Simmons has been a superb draftsman for years, as has another midcareer figure, Manuel Ocampo, now having his first New York solo in some time. Born in the Philippines, he turned out sardonic riffs on Spanish colonial religious art through the 1990's. In his new paintings, which are basically drawings, he turns a satirist's eye on the art world itself in scatological allegories that skewer every value it holds dear. Mr. Ocampo's gallery, Gray Kapernekas, which specializes in artists who first gained notice in the 1980's and 90's, celebrates its first anniversary with his show.

Félix González-Torres, another artist from those decades, grows more celebrated by the year, but is not around to enjoy the acclaim. He died of complications from AIDS at 39 in 1996. The honors usually awarded midcareer artists are piling up: he will represent the United States at the 2007 Venice Biennale; a book on him, with an essay by the Biennale's director, Robert Storr, will appear next month; and a retrospective will open in Berlin in September.

New Yorkers can see the beginnings of that retrospective in the slender, scrappy but evocative show "Félix González-Torres: Early Impressions," at El Museo del Barrio. Organized by the art historian Elvis Fuentes, it largely presents examples of the work done between 1978, when the Puerto Rican-born González-Torres was still in school, and the late 1980's, when he moved to New York. Much of the material is collaborative and ephemeral; almost all of it is politically sharp.

If you know González-Torres only from his late installations of candy and lights, you will have the pleasure of meeting the funny, voluble, vampy performer of the early videos. You will also encounter the elegiac artist of absences in a series of photographs of footprints in sand. And you will learn that this piece and others like it were inspired by the populist poster tradition of the artist's island homeland, where he began his creative life as a poet.

"I am a poet by vocation." The words might have been his. In fact, they were written in 1963 by Carl Andre, an artist who is closely identified with Minimalist sculpture, but who has always been on a path very much his own. Although his reputation has been somewhat overshadowed by that of his contemporary Donald Judd, Mr. Andre, at 71, remains the darker, more intense, more interesting figure, and you get some sense of that in his current solo show at Paula Cooper's second gallery space.

The show has several new pieces, but the real draw is early work, notably a selection from the 1972 series of poems titled "Yucatan." Arranged in blocky chunks, with words taken from a 19th-century account of the Spanish conquest of Mexico, the poems are fractured, loquacious, the typographical equivalent of stutters and screams. And they find an ideal complement in two of the artist's sectional floor pieces, which seem to spread from corners of the room like oil spills or water from a rising tide. Altogether, they make a persuasive reintroduction to a major but undervalued artist.

Other significant late-career figures are getting fresh introductions. Thomas Bayrle, a Pop-era artist influential in Germany, is having his first American show in a quarter-century at Gavin Brown's Enterprise in the West Village. An early colleague of Sigmar Polke and Gerhard Richter and a teacher of Martin Kippenberger and Tobias Rehberger, Mr. Bayrle has a background in typesetting and weaving, and this comes through in his graphically crisp images of faces (Mao Zedong, Stalin, Orson Welles) and objects (chairs, cars, city buildings) composed of dozens of smaller faces and objects.

Stylistically, the pattern-intensive results look back to M. C. Escher and forward to Andreas Gursky and digital art. They're like products of an ornamental nanotechnology. And the sociopolitical thinking behind the work — about the interdependence of the individual and the collective, and how positive or perilous that can be — is almost more interesting than the pictures themselves.

Mitchell Algus Gallery continues its invaluable rescue of overlooked careers with a sampling of work by the Japanese-born, New York-based Takeshi Kawashima. The show isn't large, but it's extensive. It encompasses both Mr. Kawashima's eye-jolting red-and-black paintings from the 1960's and his recent, candy-colored "Kaleidoscope." Both look good, and both are right in line with current trends in a Japanese pop art that has become a global favorite.

Contemporary African art is also gaining international notice. This is the intention behind "Another Modernity: Works on Paper by Uche Okeke," a modest show at the Newark Museum. It's a vivid snapshot of the career of one of Nigeria's most influential senior figures, now in his early 70's.

The show traces his rapid-fire progress from academic realism in the 1950's to a calligraphic style based on indigenous art forms and myths in the nationalist 1960's, to his Expressionist responses to the Biafran civil war of the 1970's. Like many artists with a long-sustained work life, Mr. Okeke has been an important colleague and teacher, and even a partial list of his illustrious associates — Bruce Onobrakpeya, El Anatsui and Olu Oguibe — is sufficient to indicate the rich history here.

Mr. Okeke has capped his career with abstract work, though others have consistently worked in that mode. One is the Brooklyn-based Arlington Weithers, who was born in Guyana and had his first solo in 1973. His paintings were high points of "Open House: Working in Brooklyn" at the Brooklyn Museum a few years ago, and his new pictures at AFP Galleries, with their gemlike colors and fissured textures, are fabulous.

Among American abstract painters of a still earlier generation, Jack Youngerman, 80, deserves far more attention than he has received. In the 1950's, he lived at Coenties Slip in Lower Manhattan with Ellsworth Kelly and Agnes Martin and produced a body of gorgeous paintings. Suggesting hallucinatory flowers and eruptions of light, they exuded a brushy, European-style sensuousness that was out of favor at the time but looks fresh and attractive now. The 159 small paintings on paper in his current solo at Washburn include just such images, along with other more recent work, demonstrating the consistency and variety of this admirable artist's work over half a century.

A show by Mr. Youngerman's slightly older near-contemporary, Jules Olitski, 84, at Paul Kasmin is, technically, a midcareer event, with work from the 1970's. As one of the art critic Clement Greenberg's pet Color Field artists, Mr. Olitski gained wide exposure with spray-painted abstraction in the 1960's. In the following decade, he changed styles, beefing up his surfaces with slathered-on paint the color of ghee and molasses, and turned his hand to sculptures that looked like Serra's "Torqued Ellipses" in the bud. Mr. Olitski was in his 50's at the time. He had done a lot; he would do a lot more. It was a vital moment.

The vital moment came later for Florence Pierce, 88, who is making her New York solo debut at Howard Scott Gallery. Born in Washington, she studied in New Mexico in the 1930's with Emil Bisttram, one of the Taos Transcendentalists. She settled in Albuquerque, raised a family and continued to make art in various media.

It wasn't until the 1990's, when she discovered a technique for using resin on reflective surfaces, that she came to what she considers her mature work: the low-relief abstract paintings, in whites and light-refracting aquamarines, in the show. As Ms. Pierce puts it, it took her a lifetime of activity to arrive at an art about contemplation, and then she did so only by chance.

So wisdom comes with age after all. And what can it tell young artists ready to dash out of school? Don't just do something; sit there. Art takes time. Let your brilliant career have a middle, and a late period, and an end. Let it be long.

We have a billion ideas... and we're distilling them.

So, based on what we were talking about today-

* We can look at making work in (roughly) two categories- larger projects, like installations, larger drawings, etc, and smaller work that in some way is something that would be sellable at moderate prices. Saying that, there is a danger of making work that we think would be appealing and also could dumb down or simplify in a stupid way. If the whole of the studio work relates in some way, it won't feel like merchandising in a stupid way.

* An idea along these lines includes creating a series of drawings around made up insects and animals, in part based upon 19th century taxonomic drawings. The smaller and extensive series of drawings or prints would be part of a larger exhibition, using display conventions to have a play on the fiction/non-fiction thing.

* Another idea this raises is the the opportunity to change venues, or take advantage of spaces usually reserved for scientific displays. There could be some potential in spaces that are usually ignored or poorly designed.

* Of greater importance, we could think of things like science, art, the gee-whiz thing, as ways people attempt to validate their way of looking at the world. Emphasis on attempt.. and in some way, form and technique will be decided on how we choose to focus on illustrating that drive and curiousity.

So, while this doesn't give us that pat statement, maybe some good footing. Maybe a distillation of this could be "creating work involves art, science and other ways people attempt to validate their idea of the world, presented from a number of perspectives, with a variety of ways of approaching our audience." Still general, but like we said, we can appoach specificity when projects are proposed or executed.

Left overs:

Coastopia
www.xtcian.com
sealife book (still haven't found the title of this)

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Redirecting the use of the blog...

So, I'm here in Durham- I think we can rethink (and retitle) this blog. Assuming I start working at Duke soon, this can be a place to think out ideas while at work.

This is also assuming we find a studio soonish, we can start going over everything and maybe start working on more specific projects. But I think we can keep this going, also as a place to show finished projects until we can finish a website- that may take a little while, to see how it functions best within the work we're doing.